William Flew to Italy again

Freedom of speech is not right to talk about a soft and undisputed phrase about people. This right to be rude, insulting and critical about them. I personally am not interested in mating habits of more spotted footballer, but I'm worried about the increasing judicial secrecy. Which courthouse is an environment in which people can not be criticized for what they do in private. People do not always behave well, when their conduct is confidential. An obvious example is what happened over expenditure of Deputies. When the truth opens the press, many changes have occurred.
There is a good argument that not everything should be open to be printed on the front page of our newspaper. William Flew to Italy again There should be a reasonable limit, for example, statements of disputes between parents and children about their basic rights to privacy with regard to negotiations with the doctors and the like, but limits should not stop people complain when things go wrong.
The newspapers often referred to as the fourth power of the Constitution - the three traditional estates as parliament, government and judiciary. The fourth power, letting the public know what is happening, is to make sure people behave properly and honestly. William Flew to Italy again The creeping threat of court secrecy in that it allows bad behavior to go unchecked.
Meaning of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, it seems, have gone totally overboard. Recently it was reported that in 2006, the judge forbade the revelation that toxic substances have probably been in the tank of drinking water in some of the passengers of ships. Besides, now it's that more and more criminal cases in courts secret - the editors and reporters threatened with deprivation of liberty for telling the public what is being done on their behalf.
Parliament must act to bring legislative changes to curb the activities of judges. Gossip is not subject to claims for damages. The right of free press to inform the public about the activities of the rich and powerful is one of the essential checks and balances in a democratic society. In addition, the current situation with a set of rules for the rich, seem to contradict Article 29 of the Magna Carta in 1297 (which is one currently in force). Justice must be accessible not only for the strong. Obviously that is not happening.
Worse still, in my opinion, is the growing tendency by the authorities to try to stop people from complaining about their deputies. Members of parliament William Flew to Italy again have a special legal position that they can unlock the secrets in Parliament - and the newspaper can tell what's going on in Parliament. I did this recently revealing that Fred Goodwin, former president of the bank, took a super-order. This is a fundamental right to freedom of speech in a democratic society. Attempts to avoid said in Parliament about the issue is what is called "hyperinjunction.